AI Governance Framework - Insurance Edition
Comprehensive AI governance guide for insurance organizations covering state regulatory compliance, NAIC guidance, actuarial oversight, rate filing requirements, and claims automation governance. Includes Chief Actuary collaboration frameworks, state-by-state compliance matrices, and insurance-specific policy templates.
Key Insights
Insurance AI governance must navigate a unique regulatory environment: 50+ state insurance commissioners, NAIC guidance, actuarial standards, and unfair discrimination requirements that apply specifically to insurance decisions. Generic AI governance frameworks miss these industry-specific requirements.
This insurance-focused framework addresses the full scope of insurance AI governance: state-by-state compliance considerations, NAIC Model Bulletin requirements, actuarial validation of AI models, rate filing preparation and justification, and preventing unfair discrimination in underwriting and claims. It covers the full range of insurance AI applications including underwriting, claims automation, fraud detection, and pricing.
Overview
Insurance AI operates under regulatory requirements unlike any other industry. State insurance commissioners have explicit authority over AI use in underwriting, claims, and pricing. NAIC guidance sets expectations for AI governance and bias testing. Actuarial standards require validation of AI models used in insurance decisions. Rate filings must justify AI-driven pricing.
This comprehensive framework is built specifically for insurance organizations. It translates generic AI governance principles into insurance-specific requirements, provides guidance for navigating multi-state compliance, and addresses the unique AI applications in insurance operations.
What's Inside
- Insurance Regulatory Landscape: Overview of state insurance commissioner authority, NAIC Model Bulletin on AI, and emerging state-specific AI requirements
- Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance: Framework for managing AI governance across 50+ state regulatory environments with varying requirements
- NAIC Model Bulletin Compliance: Detailed guidance on meeting NAIC expectations for AI governance, risk management, and consumer protection
- Actuarial Standards Integration: Alignment with ASOPs for AI models used in pricing, reserving, and underwriting including validation requirements
- Rate Filing Requirements: Preparing AI model documentation for rate filings, supporting data requirements, and responding to regulator questions
- Unfair Discrimination Prevention: Testing methodologies and documentation for demonstrating AI models don't discriminate on prohibited bases
- Use Case Governance: Specific governance requirements for underwriting AI, claims automation, fraud detection, pricing models, and agent/broker recommendations
- Implementation Roadmap: 90-180 day implementation timeline tailored for insurance organizational structures
Who This Is For
- Chief Underwriting Officers implementing AI in underwriting
- Chief Claims Officers automating claims with AI
- Chief Actuaries validating AI models for regulatory compliance
- Chief Compliance Officers managing state regulatory requirements
- Insurance CAIOs/CTOs building governance programs
Why This Resource
Generic AI governance frameworks don't address insurance-specific requirements. This framework understands that insurance AI governance must satisfy state regulators who have explicit authority over AI use, actuaries who must sign off on model validity, and compliance teams navigating 50+ jurisdictional requirements.
Every section addresses insurance context: not just "test for bias" but how to test for unfair discrimination under insurance regulations; not just "document your models" but what documentation rate filings require.
FAQ
Q: How does this address NAIC Model Bulletin requirements?
A: The framework provides detailed mapping to NAIC Model Bulletin expectations including governance structure, risk management, third-party oversight, and consumer impact assessment. It includes specific compliance checklists for each NAIC requirement.
Q: What about state-by-state AI requirements?
A: The multi-jurisdictional compliance section addresses varying state requirements including Colorado's AI Act applicability to insurance, state-specific bias testing requirements, and rate filing expectations that differ by state.
Q: Does this cover actuarial validation of AI models?
A: Yes. The actuarial standards integration section addresses ASOP compliance for AI models, including validation requirements, documentation standards, and the actuary's role in AI model governance.
What's Inside
- Insurance Regulatory Landscape: Overview of state insurance commissioner authority, NAIC Model Bulletin on AI, and emerging state-specific AI requirements
- Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance: Framework for managing AI governance across 50+ state regulatory environments with varying requirements
- NAIC Model Bulletin Compliance: Detailed guidance on meeting NAIC expectations for AI governance, risk management, and consumer protection
- Actuarial Standards Integration: Alignment with ASOPs for AI models used in pricing, reserving, and underwriting including validation requirements
- Rate Filing Requirements: Preparing AI model documentation for rate filings, supporting data requirements, and responding to regulator questions
- Unfair Discrimination Prevention: Testing methodologies and documentation for demonstrating AI models don't discriminate on prohibited bases
- Use Case Governance: Specific governance requirements for underwriting AI, claims automation, fraud detection, pricing models, and agent/broker recommendations
- Implementation Roadmap: 90-180 day implementation timeline tailored for insurance organizational structures
Ready to Get Started?
Sign up for a free Explorer account to download this resource and access more AI governance tools.
Create Free Account